Hiring Intelligence
Demo data · 6 submissions · Wise
Your priorities
Data-driven actions to improve your hiring health score
Your 38-day average is losing you top candidates to faster companies. Aim to make a decision within 21 days of first contact.
Only 17% of candidates received useful feedback. Even a 2–3 sentence specific note improves candidate NPS significantly.
33% of candidates said salary information was unclear. Transparent ranges reduce late-stage dropouts and wasted interviews.
Your response rate of 83% is strong but candidates wait 38 days on average for a decision — 35% slower than the industry standard. Speeding up your process is your single biggest opportunity.
Your 83% response rate beats the industry average of 40% — candidates know they will hear back from you.
Candidate NPS of 3.8/5 is above the 3.4 benchmark — people who do hear back rate the experience positively.
Communication quality rated positively by 67% of candidates — above the 65% industry benchmark.
38-day average process duration is 35% slower than the 28-day industry standard — top candidates are accepting other offers first.
Only 17% of rejected candidates received useful feedback vs 27% industry average — candidates feel the process lacks closure.
1 in 6 candidates reported being ghosted at some stage — damaging employer brand on public review sites.
Your data
Based on 6 submissions (all time)
Candidate comments
See all comments →“Refreshingly straightforward. Salary range was in the listing and the offer matched. Recruiter kept me updated throughout.”
“The interviews themselves were excellent. People were warm, well-prepared, and genuinely interested in my portfolio.”
You rank #2 out of 10 companies in this demo. Your NPS of 3.8/5 exceeds the 3.4/5 benchmark. Your main gap vs top performers is process speed and rejection feedback quality.
See full leaderboard →Show candidates you take hiring transparency seriously. Companies that share their score see 2× more applications.
“Best hiring process I have been through. Two technical rounds, both well-structured. Got detailed written feedback within 48 hours even though I did not get the role.”